|
Effect of Tying Eligibility for Health Insurance Subsidies to the
Federal Poverty Level
February 2007
http://www.kff.org/insurance/snapshot/chcm021507oth.cfm
Considerable attention has been paid in recent years to the rapid
growth of health insurance premiums and its impact on coverage
affordability. Premium growth has far outpaced growth in workers
earnings, which means that workers have to spend more of their
income each year on health care to maintain current coverage levels.
Less attention has been given to the disconnection between the
growing cost of health insurance and eligibility for health care
subsidies in public programs. It is clear that lower income people
cannot afford health insurance without some assistance, and various
federal and state programs exist to provide or subsidize health
insurance for people with limited means. In many cases eligibility
for subsidized coverage is based on the relationship of a person's
or family's income to the federal poverty level (FPL). For example,
children in families with incomes below 200 percent of FPL are
generally eligible for subsidized coverage through state Medicaid or
SCHIP programs. Another example is a new program in Massachusetts,
which requires people to purchase health insurance. The program
provides free coverage to adults with family incomes under poverty
and subsidizes a portion of premiums (a declining share as income
rises) for adults with family incomes between 100 and 300 percent of
FPL.1
People in families with incomes of more than 300 percent of FPL
generally are expected to pay the full cost of health insurance.
Ideally, the eligibility and subsidy structure in a public program
should relate the amount of assistance that a person receives to
their ability to afford the good being subsidized (in this case,
health insurance). When policymakers in Massachusetts, for example,
provide partial premium subsidies to families with incomes at 200
percent of FPL and no subsidies for families with incomes over 300
percent of FPL, they are saying, at least implicitly, that the
families at 200 percent of FPL generally have enough income to
afford to pay a share of the premium and that the families at 300
percent of FPL generally can afford health insurance without
financial assistance. This subsidy arrangement tells us how
policymakers view the affordability of health insurance for people
with different incomes. Unfortunately, if the cost of health
insurance rises faster than the eligibility thresholds for subsidies
over a sustained period, the subsidy arrangement may not maintain a
consistent level of financial protection.
Figure 1 shows the cumulative increases in private health insurance
premiums and the FPL over a nine-year period (1996 to 2004).2
Figure 1
Cumulative Change in
Single and Family Health
Insurance Premiums and
Federal Poverty Level, 1996 - 2004

|
Source: Premium data from Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey,
1996-2004, at
http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/; Federal Poverty
Level based on HHS Federal Poverty Guidelines (1996
through 2004) at
http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/figures-fed-reg.shtml.
Rate of growth based on change for one person (change
for 4 person family would be 20.8% rather than 20.3%
over the period). |
Private premiums for family coverage doubled and premiums for single
coverage increased by 86% during the period, while the FPL increased
only about 20%. This dynamic matters very little for people who
receive full subsidies for health insurance, because the amount that
they have to pay does not change. For a family whose income is just
over the eligibility threshold, however, the share of family income
required to purchase health insurance would rise over the period by
about 55% for single coverage and by about 68% for family coverage.3
Take as an example a single person with income at 300 percent of
FPL, which was about $23,220 in 1996 and about $27,930 in 2004. A
health insurance plan that cost the person $1,200 in 1996 would
consume just 5.2% of income. With premium inflation, that plan would
cost over $2,230 in 2004, or about 8.0% of income for a person with
income at 300 percent of FPL. This share of income going to health
insurance would continue to rise over time as long as health
insurance premiums rise faster than FPL.4
This dynamic has important implications for policymakers. As long as
health insurance premiums continue to rise more quickly than the
costs of other goods and services,5
eligibility thresholds tied to FPL (or a multiple of FPL) will not
maintain a consistent level of financial protection against rising
health insurance costs. If policymakers want to protect low and
moderate income families from spending too high a percentage of
their income on health insurance, they will need to consider subsidy
structures that reach an expanding income range over time. Options
might include increasing income thresholds for subsidies at the same
rate as the cost of health insurance or making periodic adjustments
in thresholds to account for the rapid growth in health insurance
premiums relative to incomes and other costs.
1. Children in families with income up to 300% of FPL are
covered through Medicaid.
2. Premium increases are the year-to-year change in average
premiums for single and family coverage for employer-sponsored
health insurance reported in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
Federal Poverty Level increases are the year-to-year change in the
Federal Poverty Level as measured by the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services Poverty Guidelines. See
http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/figures-fed-reg.shtml. The growth in
FPL is based on the change in federal poverty guideline for a single
person. Because of rounding, the annual changes for a family of four
would differ slightly, with the cumulative growth between 1996 and
2004 being 20.8% rather than 20.3%.
3. The calculation for a person with a partial premium subsidy
depends on how the subsidy program is structured. If, for example, a
program is designed to subsidize a percentage of the premium (e.g.,
25% subsidy for people with incomes of 275% of FPL), then a person
at that level of poverty will have to pay a greater share of their
income each year toward the 75% of the premium that they are
required to pay. If, however, the premium subsidy is designed as a
percentage of income that the person must pay (e.g., no more than 4%
of income at 250% of FPL), then the program bears the increasing
cost of insurance relative to FPL.)
4. A person could reduce the share of income going to health
insurance by buying a health plan with less coverage. This example
assumes the average rate of increase for employer-sponsored single
coverage over the period, which implicitly includes any coverage
changes that occurred on average in the market.
5. The HHS federal poverty guidelines are a simplified version
of the federal poverty threshold determined by the U.S. Census
Bureau. Annual increases in the Census poverty thresholds are based
on increases in general inflation. See
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/povdef.html.
|