The Allstate [deny help to Katrina victims]
Tuesday, January 2. 2007
http://www.leagueoffans.org/blog/index.php?/archives/58-The-Allstate-deny-help-to-Katrina-victims-Sugar-Bowl.html
Allstate is the
new title sponsor (for at least the next four years at an
undisclosed "seven figure" cost) of the
Sugar Bowl,
played at the Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana on January 3,
2007. But many are left wondering how Allstate can market themselves
on everything involving the largest annual sporting event in New
Orleans, yet deny liability and living expenses to so many customers
who suffered losses in the region due to Hurricanes Katrina and
Rita.
As the second largest property/casualty insurance company with 22
percent of the marketshare in Louisiana, Allstate has used the "wind
versus flood" claim to escape responsibility to their homeowners
policyholders. As Rebecca Mowbray of the New Orleans
Times-Picayune
reports:
"Allstate has clashed so much with state insurance regulators
throughout the year over its rising insurance rates that the
Louisiana Insurance Rating
Commission held a special hearing earlier this month
on Allstate's business practices. Meanwhile, [Allstate's]... ratios
of [1,287] complaints to the amount of business it does in the state
were high enough to trigger an investigation by the
Louisiana Department of
Insurance."
Mowbray continues:
"Amy Bach, executive director of the California advocacy group
United Policyholders,
says insurance companies sponsor events and advertise heavily when
they need to shore up their reputations and distract the public from
how they handled claims. She said the Sugar Bowl is no exception.
'The way they have historically countered bad publicity on claims is
advertising during sporting events,' Bach said. 'I would hope that
the citizens of your state would be smart enough to see it for what
it is: a naked bribe to get people to forget how they've been
treated. I hope people don't fall for it. If they want to throw
their money around, they should throw it around so that someone
could get a roof back on their house. Someone else could sponsor
it,' Bach added."
Americans for Insurance Reform
(AIR) provides a
background report
on the insurance industry's response (highlighting Allstate, among
others) to Hurricane Katrina:
"Hurricane Katrina was one of the worst disasters in our nation's
history, killing over 1,300 people (with thousands more still
unaccounted for), displacing millions, and leaving hundreds of
thousands without jobs or income. With the impact compounded by
Hurricane Rita shortly thereafter, hundreds of thousands of homes
were destroyed or significantly damaged. In the days and first few
weeks following the disaster, many individuals were left destitute,
without food, water or a roof over their heads. The entire world
watched this horror unfold on their television screens. There was no
denying the magnitude and human suffering caused by this
catastrophe.
In a disaster as devastating as Katrina, the availability of
insurance can literally become a matter of life or death, especially
regarding the promise of temporary living expenses under 'loss of
use' clauses in homeowners policies, which many residents in
Louisiana and Mississippi had. Many homeowners policyholders who
were hungry, exhausted, traumatized and homeless, immediately looked
to their insurance carriers to come to their aid with living
expenses as they struggled to survive.
However, what many of these residents found was not help, but rather
resistance by their insurance carriers to pay them anything at all.
It was soon after Katrina hit that insurance companies began looking
for ways to escape responsibility to their homeowners policyholders
altogether, publicly declaring that most, if not all, of the damage
was due to flooding [rather than wind and wind-driven rain, which
are covered]. That meant that only those who carried separate flood
insurance (far less than half the residents), which is underwritten
by the federal government, would get any coverage, leaving insurers
entirely off the hook for paying Katrina-related claims. This
included payment of temporary living expenses, which flood insurance
does not provide. This was despite the fact that neither the law nor
the facts justified insurers' behavior."
Americans for Insurance Reform on Allstate:
"Allstate seems to have been the recipient of an unusual number of
complaints. In fact, on October 7, 2005, acting on a petition filed
by the Texas Attorney General and Insurance Department, a Texas
court ordered Allstate 'to obey the law and start covering the
living expenses of its Texas policyholders who were displaced by
Hurricane Rita.... The insurance department said it had received
scores of complaints from Allstate customers. A spokesman for the
insurance department said Allstate has refused to cover "additional
living expenses" -- such as hotel or motel charges -- for families
displaced by Hurricane Rita.'
The AIR hotline has received similar complaints about Allstate from
Louisiana and Mississippi residents:
- A Louisiana woman had been trying to get an adjuster to come to
her home for over a month after the hurricane but had no luck in
getting suitable answers from her homeowners insurer Allstate. She
said that many people in her area were having the same problem with
Allstate. Allstate had assigned her an adjuster, but this adjuster
had not returned calls or been responsive. 'I called and called and
called, she said. After having to go ahead and have her roof fixed
and having other repairs done to the house prior to her adjuster's
visit, she is concerned that she will not be properly reimbursed. An
adjuster finally came in November but they are still working on her
case. She says that Allstate told her that they needed new software
in order to work quicker, and she noted that this has taken 'way too
damn long.'
- A New Orleans woman was repeatedly told by Allstate that they've
sent out the checks due her but she did not receive them. When she
has pressed Allstate representatives on what dates the checks were
sent she was told a different date every time leading her to believe
that they are simply stalling in paying out the large sum she is
due. This went on for at least two months.
- A woman's home in Harvey, LA sustained severe roof damage,
effectively making the home unlivable until she could get a new
roof. After receiving her initial check for living expenses from her
homeowners insurer Allstate, she was unable to speak to anyone at
the company regarding the status of her claim and was therefore
unable to go forward with roof repair. In the meantime, Hurricane
Rita further damaged her home. For weeks, Allstate had been unable
to tell her when she could expect an adjuster to visit her home.
'There wouldn't be half as much water damage if they had been able
to get an adjuster out here in a reasonable amount of time,' she
explained.
- A woman from New Orleans whose home suffered significant roof
damage says she had been told multiple times by representatives at
her homeowner insurer Allstate that they had sent her temporary
living expenses. For four weeks, Allstate representatives repeatedly
told her that they would overnight the check to her family members'
home where she was staying, but the check did not arrive. 'I could
never get the same person on the phone,' she said. 'Every time I got
through to their offices it was like I had to start the whole
process over again.'
- The roof of a Houma, LA woman's house was blown off. In an effort
to minimize the damage, she tried to get an adjuster out to her home
for an assessment for several weeks after the storm, but while she
was repeatedly told by her homeowners insurer Allstate that an
adjuster would visit her property within 72 hours, no one came for
several weeks. Before the adjuster made it to her property she had
three contractors give her estimates on what it would cost to repair
the damage she had sustained. When an adjuster finally came and
presented her with the total amount that Allstate was willing to
provide her, it was only half of the amount of the estimates she had
received. As a result, she has been forced to dip into her savings
to pay for the reconstruction. 'With all the back and forth I feel
like I lost 20 years of my life trying to deal with Allstate
insurance,' she said.
- When a Gulfport, MS man finally closed on his home in May of 2004,
he decided on purchasing homeowners and flood protection insurance
through Allstate and filled out the necessary paperwork for both.
However, after filing his homeowners and flood claims in the wake of
Katrina, he was told that while there was a record of his requesting
flood insurance there was no record of his being granted flood
insurance. He is told that he will recoup nothing for the extensive
damage to his property.
- An elderly Pass Christian, MS man and his wife, who has recently
been diagnosed with breast cancer, initially had a terrible time
getting their 'loss of use' funds from Allstate. Their home had been
completely wiped out by the storm and they were forced to move into
a temporary residence, putting a strain on them financially. Months
later, they have received the final assessment from Allstate, only
offering them one-quarter of the amount of their total homeowners
and flood polices, despite the fact that their home had been
completely wiped out. Out of desperation they decided to accept the
reduced amount on their flood payment, but have decided to retain an
attorney to challenge this decision.
- A Bay St. Louis, MS, man was told that it was 'case closed' as far
as his homeowners claim with Allstate is concerned. The damage to
his home was declared entirely the result of flooding despite the
fact that two separate inspections of his house showed a waterline
of only 8 and 10 inches respectively and the fact that there is a
hole in his roof from a tree falling on it.
- A New Orleans woman's home in the lower ninth ward was heavily
damaged by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. While she received a $2,500
advance from her home insurer State Farm just weeks after the first
storm, the insurer servicing her flood insurance, Allstate,
repeatedly put off sending her the advance check she had been
promised. In the month following Hurricane Katrina she burned
through all of her savings and was reduced to spending some of her
evenings sleeping in her car. It was over a month before she
received the advance she had been promised from Allstate. Now, four
months after the storm, she has had adjusters out to her property
but has not received any compensation from her insurers and is
struggling to get by on her savings. She told AIR, 'I haven't paid
premiums to two companies all these years to be starving,
struggling, and homeless.'
Company Response: These and other stories were reported to an
Allstate
spokesperson who said that it would be inappropriate for him to
discuss Allstate policyholders' problems with a third party. He
said, 'I can tell you, I am not going to discuss people's private
matters with you ... or the press.' He also said that it would not
be practical to discuss these cases because they are only partial
facts and not the whole story. He stated that Allstate stands ready
to deal with all of their customers directly. AIR called Allstate
headquarters again and a representative gave a phone number for
aggrieved policyholders to call. AIR contacted these policyholders
and passed along the phone number.
... Insisting that the 2005 hurricanes financially hurt the
industry, insurers have been indicating that huge industry-wide rate
hikes and cutbacks in coverage were to come.... It now seems that
the property/casualty insurance industry's profitability for 2005
will be extraordinarily high even with hurricane losses.... The
Consumer Federation of America
has estimated that 2005 was the third greatest profit year in the
property/casualty industry's history, despite the hurricanes of
2005."
So as Allstate uses the Sugar Bowl in New Orleans to advertise their
way around how they handled claims resulting from Hurricanes Katrina
and Rita, just remember that Allstate's "good hands" have very
slippery fingers, and are only "good" for a slap in the face.
|